Pages

Thursday, November 23, 2017

Autonomous Weapons are the wave of the Future


This is scary stuff, but it is going to get real. The following is an article that points to a video that demonstrates the carnage autonomous weapons can inflict:


The video is produced by UC Berkeley professor Stuart Russell and references the website: http://autonomousweapons.org/

The organization takes a very "Western" centric view of this issue. Furthermore the proponents of the ban are missing the point entirely. We have past the point of no return. The Genie is out of the bottle. Drone strikes are being conducted by State actors. With miniaturization, this capability will be available in the hands of hobbyists. An anonymous "hit" can be executed by person who remotely controls a little drone with a lethal injection or chemical to get rid of a target in sight while sitting in a car that is either stationery or while in motion. If he/she misses, it will be chalked to collateral damage. No need for AI, no need for facial recognition (camera will do) for executing this hit. Anyone who can control a miniature drone can annihilate a target and there will be no traceablility. How are non-state actors going to be stopped? Political Leaders will have to move around in bomb proof enclosures and use holographic images for public appearances. Public figures will have establish a public Avatar so that they can lead a private life. 

On one hand this is an excellent way to neutralize big budget Military spending. On the other hand (I am talking like an economist) the implications are many. For Bharat, this technology is the best way to neutralize Terroristan (Pakistan) and constant needling from China. It obviates the need for boots on the ground, piloted Jet fighters, sitting ducks like Aircraft carriers and heavy artillery. As mentioned in the excellently produced video it makes nuclear weapons obsolete. In the future military arsenal will consist of rockets and drones of various capacities. Whether they are autonomous or remotely controlled is just a degree of sophistication. An army of soldiers can control an army of drones.

There is no stopping technology. What we need to think is how to neutralize this trend. Trying to ban it is like pushing rope. We can't let rogue actors who have this capability utilize it. No amount of surveillance (CCTV, Cell Phone monitoring) will be adequate. At some point this will reach a crisis stage. One solution is Mind Control. Shades of 1984. This will have to start at the preschool level and the mind of the individual checked periodically. Bursts of anger will be monitored and violent actions would be punished. We will have to kiss the Western notion of Democracy and Privacy goodbye. Personal privacy will be a thing of the past. The challenge is to leverage technology while addressing its pitfalls like this one.

Mind control is another frontier that is rapidly progressing. Take a look at this:

https://www.ted.com/talks/greg_gage_how_to_control_someone_else_s_arm_with_your_brain

What if neutralizing this anonymous hit threat, requires that everyone be embedded with sensors that monitor their thoughts?

This article elucidates the socio-political-economic impact of automation. Technology could very well herald the Utopian Dream:

http://deshbandhu.blogspot.in/2017/04/usa-2100_21.html

Hopefully rue merit will be rewarded and it will end the current trend towards mediocrity and populism. Maybe we will realize John Lennon's dream some day.

https://vimeo.com/18730165

Maybe, just maybe. We hope!





Friday, April 21, 2017

USA 2100



While technologists point to the advances in automation that will displace many jobs that humans perform, economists are scratching their heads and are not looking beyond the near future. Sociologists haven't a clue other than forecasting an ominous future. Educators are noting that we are moving towards an unstructured world and our current education system is tailored to a factory oriented assembly line. Technologists, economists, sociologists and educators focus on their own silos of expertise and don't look at the complete picture. Opinions are expressed in the context of the silos of each opinion maker. Politicians are concerned about getting elected, responding to the immediate needs of their constituents and responding to crisis. There needs to be some thought given to what children born today will encounter when they reach middle age and their senior years. There are competing predictions. However there is no analysis that ties it all together in a socioeconomic and political context.

This article takes a comprehensive view of the developments and forces at play in looking at what the future could well turn out. It focuses on the US, since that is where the initial impact would occur.

In the beginning of the 22nd Century:

By the year 2100 Automation will have penetrated every aspect of American life. Cars will be self driven. So will trains, buses and planes. Robots will do the cooking and cleaning. Everything conceivable that requires human effort will be automated. Robots will even look after children, the elderly and the invalid. Only the most sophisticated, delicate and intricate tasks will be performed by humans. That too will be a rarity. It will be an era of plenty. Energy will be plentiful; mostly safe renewable solar, wind and nuclear energy. Even defense will be highly automated, consisting of missiles, jet fighters that fly by themselves, drones and micro-drones. These micro-drones will be able to seek and incapacitate an individual by stinging them with a powerful sedative or kill them with a lethal injection. Hunger and poverty will be banished. There will be no shortage of essential goods and creature comforts. Technological breakthroughs in energy, automation in manufacturing, construction, farming etc. will have brought the cost of goods and services down significantly and it will become economical and viable to just give everyone their basic necessities along with robots to serve them.

With increasing unemployment a Guaranteed Minimum Income Program (GMI) will have to be instituted. It will be further expanded. Credits will replace the Monetary System. Everyone will be given Monthly Basic Credits (MBCs) – Housing Credits, Food Credits and Discretionary Credits. Education and Healthcare will be free. People will be able to earn more Credits in a variety of ways, reminiscent of jobs as defined in the 21st Century, to afford more. Inflation will be virtually non-existent since everything is indexed to the Credits. A commodity will cost the same number of Credits regardless. Money will have ceased to be important and the notion of banking and investing might even be disbanded which may precipitate the demise of Wall Street. Wall Street may exist only in name.

Private Capitalism will be replaced by State Capitalism. The importance of “Capital” itself will diminish. Technology will devour the current notion of Capitalism. National self-sufficiency which is an embodiment of what Gandhi postulated will be the prevailing mantra.

There will be peace and happiness. It will take significant changes and cataclysmic shifts to get to this situation. Even with a few detractors, the majority agree that the solution achieved will be as close to Utopia as one can get.

The path to the Age of Leisure:

The US consists of:

  • Makers, who add “real” value to the economy
  • Takers, who live of entitlements and subsidies

With the advent of automation, more and more people will be forced out of work. The Taker population will comprise of not only habitual Takers, but others forced into this predicament due to the unavailability of jobs or their inability to function as Makers in the highly specialized environment. As more and more automation sets in, even the service economy will be affected and service jobs like gardening, burger flipping, waiting & busing tables etc. will get automated. This will create a major rift between the Haves and the Have Nots. The country will have a dwindling population of Makers, Servers (Service Providers) and an expanding population of Takers.

Food Stamps to the Rescue:

To counter the trend of increasing poverty, the Food Stamp Program and Unemployment Benefits will have to be expanded. Providing and extending these entitlements will be heavily fought over by fiscal conservatives. Their point well taken. Money spent on entitlements is not effective in solving the problem. Government and the poor have one thing in common. Both live beyond their means and spend more than they have. Furthermore, money poured at the bottom and near bottom of the pyramid bubbles up to the top and the income gap widens. But the government will be faced with rising unemployment resulting in increasing poverty and less money being spent. The consumer economy will collapse and this will set a downward spiral in the price of produce and manufactured goods. Massive deflation will set in. The country will get thrown into deep depression. Guaranteed Minimum Income (GMI) is the only answer and will have to be introduced. The alternative is “refugee colonies” where people are taken care of and live a structured communal life. Meanwhile due to investments in automation, the entire Farm to Fork chain will be automated. As a result the agriculture economy will go into a downward tail spin. With falling prices, farmers will default on their loans banks will be left holding the bag and the government will be forced to take over bankrupted farms. With the ever expanding Food Stamp program, it will make eminent sense for the government to own agriculture. This will introduce State Capitalism and impact Free Market Capitalism. A Food Stamp Economy will emerge, it will be a success. Hunger and malnutrition will be eliminated.

The situation in cities will deteriorate. Homelessness will be on the rise to unprecedented levels. The country will be driven to the brink of disaster by uncontrollable law and order. Prisons will over flow and the government will have to start building more prisons to accommodate the increasing population of criminals.

Enter Housing Credits:

While the situation gets worse; and on the verge of reaching a tipping point of anarchy, the politicians citing the success of the Food Stamp program will recommend that the government apply this principle to Housing as well and just give minimum housing to Takers. The rationale will be instead of building more prisons, why not build housing. Food is already taken care of and housing will take care of giving people a roof over their heads. And so along with Food Stamps, the government will issue Housing Credits. This will bring about significant relief to the situation and more Monetary relief.

The Collapse of Commodity Prices:

Extensive recycling and reuse will result in judicious use of non-renewable resources. This will extend the availability of non-renewable resources for the 22nd Century and beyond. The drop in demand will crater the prices of raw materials. Mining, refining, transportation, manufacturing, delivering will be automated with minimal human intervention. Technological breakthroughs in energy, automation in manufacturing, construction, etc. will bring the cost of goods and services down even further. With the collapse of prices and subsequent defaults, the politicians will recommend that the government take over of mines and oil fields as well. That will sound the death knell of Free Market Capitalism and will be replaced fully by State Capitalism. Fossil fuels will become yesterday’s energy source and demand for it will evaporate. With that the debate on climate change will be put to bed. The cost of goods will drop to such an insignificant level that it becomes economical and viable to just give the Takers the essentials that they need along with robots to serve them as well, to enjoy a comfortable Quality of Life of Leisure, since energy is cheap and everything is automated.

The New US:

The US will become completely self sufficient. Trading with other countries will decrease to a negligible level. The world will be forced to survive without relying on the US economy. Europe and the BRICS countries will pick up the slack. The US will no longer be accused of pursuing an expansionist foreign policy. The rhetoric will shift to the rest of the world accusing the US of being an isolationist. National self sufficiency which is an embodiment of what Gandhi postulated will be the prevailing mantra. China that copies US innovations indiscriminately will cry fowl since Chinese innovations will be replicated in the US. The Dollar may continue to be an International Currency, but most of the Dollars will circulate overseas since the US finds little use for it domestically. A Dollar to US Credit exchange will emerge. This will be utilized by tourists visiting the US, and by US citizens wishing to travel abroad and for existing trade to acquire Rare Earths and the like. The entire Product Cycle from Supply Chain, Manufacturing and Distribution being automated requires very little human intervention. Robots will build and produce, humans will consume. Technological advances will reduce or eliminate the reliance on Capital. The new order is not “Capitalism” (State or Private), Socialism or Communism. Scholars will wrestle with what to call it.

Fundamental Rights:

Entitlements will be re-branded and will become Fundamental Rights which will include Basic food and Housing; institutionalized as the Right to Food and Right to Housing. To this Right to Education will be added; which will become essentially free and dispensed through Massive Open On-line Courses (MOOCs), and the Right to Health Care; which which will also be highly automated and free. The much fought over and maligned Affordable Care Act will be re-branded as Right to Health and made Universal.

Cradle to Grave Security:

With cradle to grave support provided for by the government, there will be no need for 20th Century entitlement programs - Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Disability, Welfare, Unemployment Benefits, subsidies etc. will all be eliminated. With the basic set of Rights established, all forms of Subsidies and Entitlements will be eliminated. Everyone will be entitled to these Rights and in order to avail of these Rights a set of Responsibilities will have to established to maintain social balance and harmony. All of these transitions will provide more Monetary relief to the government. A new category of people will emerge; Servers, who serve Makers; Servers who serve affluent Makers who prefer to be served by humans rather than robots. And so we have Makers, Takers and Servers.

Credits will Replace Currency:

In implementing these fundamental rights the government will establish a new currency of exchange called Credits. Since Food Stamps and Housing Credits will already be in place, all rolled into a Basic Credit System of Food Credits, Housing Credits. Education and Healthcare will not require any Credits. A new Credit will be introduced called Discretionary Credits. These could be commonly called FC, HC and DC. Discretionary Credits could be applied to anything. Takers will able to live within the Basic Credits they are given. The income inequality that widened in first part of the 21st Century will vanish. Makers could earn more Credits by virtue of their occupation and contribution to society, much like today, which will allow them to live a more “affluent” life style. Makers will be able to upgrade their housing by applying Discretionary Credits or chose to live a simple lifestyle on their entitled Housing Credits. They could use their Discretionary Credits (entitled and earned) for whatever they chose. Inheritance rights will be preserved. People, who inherited property, will have no use for their unused Housing Credits. The Commercial and Rental Real Estate market will collapse with dwindling demand. It will become the property of the government by default. The oldest profession may continue to exist.

Inflation and Deflation Eliminated:

Goods and Services will be pegged to Credits and their cost in Credits will remain the same. For instance a Pound or Kilo of Salt; the very basic essential could be pegged at One Food Credit. The price of all food items could be derived in relation to a Pound or Kilo of Salt. Each individual could be given one Housing Credit per month. A family of four would be entitled to a four bedroom apartment. With this system of Credits, inflation or deflation will be completely eliminated.

The Demise of Wall Street:

With the establishment of Credits which is a virtual currency; with inflation/deflation beaten, the notion of banking and investing will be disbanded which will lead to the demise of Wall Street. The demand for Bankers, Brokers, Investment Counselors, and Economists will be eliminated, except for a few in the government to deal with International Trade, which will be minimal.

The Leisure Reality of the 22nd Century:

The age old saying, “An idle mind is a devil’s workshop,” is an axiom that transcends generations and holds true for the human race. Kids will be kids, they challenge authority and some get into trouble. The educationalists who critiqued the “assembly line” education system that was devised for the industrial age and prepared graduates for “structured” work in a “structured” environment, will finally have their say. Factories requiring organized human labour will cease to exist. Working on innovation involves a significant amount of flexibility and self direction. The criticism of these educationalists will come home to roost in this new era. A child who grows up and chooses not to seek a “job”, will be given the “tools” to keep preoccupied and out of trouble. The emphasis of education will have to be reoriented to prepare children for this unstructured society by instilling civic responsibility and discipline. Schools will have to teach children to think independently, work in groups to solve problems with adequate assistance and minimal supervision. Habitual offenders might have to be assigned to boot camps to remedy their behaviour. As a result, the criminal population will decline and include only the “hopeless” cases. A walled predominantly self governed township could be set up to isolate criminals and these exceptions.

Preparing for the Age of Leisure:

A number of initiatives will have to be introduced to handle the majority Taker population. The following are some suggestions.

Promote the idea of Entertainment & Activity Centers where people can utilize their Discretionary Credits to access the recreational facilities provided. Many activities can be provided free; others purchased with Discretionary Credits. Tournaments, games could be conducted to enable people to earn Discretionary Credits that they can use for special privileges like golfing, horse back riding, etc.

There can be many avenues like volunteering, taking courses etc. to earn DCs and that could be used to acquire things to satisfy human vanity, such as human made items or works of art.

While these Entertainment and Activity Centers could be accessible to everyone, exclusive Country Clubs can be set up as well that require significant DCs to access. These would be the places frequented by affluent Makers. This would be a true meritocracy wherein competence and creating value earns more DCs. The more one earns the more they can afford, while no one is denied their Basic Rights.

There can be other things established to ensure Quality of Life. For instance by using Discretionary Credits, people can take vacations. A Time Share like system would allow individuals and families to select the type of vacation they wish to have. Airfare, ground transportation and lodging would require Discretionary Credits. Food Credits will cover Food. The more Discretionary Credits a person possesses the more they will be able to afford, like upgrades to a more luxurious vacation.

An exchange facility can be established whereby a person, couple or family living in one location could exchange places with an equivalent in another location. Individuals and families can move around as and when they wish provided they are able to find an exchange opportunity.

Another phenomena that may emerge is that every once in awhile some Takers who excel in creativity and an art form or innovation would emerge and achieve some recognition. This will earn them more Discretionary Credits. It will not uncommon for a Maker to transition into a Taker and then re-emerge as a Maker.

People would have lots of choices. Farmers could migrate to cities to experience a new life. Many city dwellers could move to rural America and chose the simple rural life of being close to nature and mother earth.

Towards a new World order:

The tumultuous period the US will go through while automation displaces humans, will be decried by the rest of the world as the curse of Capitalism. On the one hand, the GDP will increase rapidly, the US may become a net exporter of goods and food grains, that will wipe out the trade deficit. Initially as the US economic indicators look good people’s lives will be decimated, with the rest of the world not faring better. It is only when the US realizes that the economic principles in vogue are irrelevant and that a rapid transition to a new world order is the solution.

The US will emerge from its predicament and reinstate its position of world leader and become the beacon for other countries to follow. With plenty to give and nothing to want, US can take an active role in aiding the rest of the world and replicate its success.

A path to a new world order might emerge where borders become meaningless and the term; “citizenship” would become a term of association as opposed to a term of privilege or rights. The world might look more and more like it does from space; a Blue Marble with people living in harmony and peace.

References and supporting information:

John Maynard Keynes, wrote an article in 1930 titled - Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren where he takes “wings into the future.” What can we reasonably expect the level of our economic life to be a hundred years hence?  His basic premise is that productivity will continue to increase rendering more and more humans jobless.


2030 is more than a decade away and John Maynard's forecast is amazingly on target. Advances in automation, is affecting workers in developed countries and the impact is undeniable.

Jeremy Rifkin has coined the phrase, “The Zero Marginal Cost Society,” and written a book pointing out that the rapid advances in technology is “speeding us to an era of nearly free goods and services.”




He explains the impact on society in a talk he gave at the Churchill Club:






Nonemployed - As robots grow smarter, American workers struggle to keep up”:


This trend will continue to pick up pace and in the future we will see more and more jobs being performed by robots. So what does the future hold? Watch this video on humans need not apply:


And the alarm it raised for the author of the following article:


Computers are becoming smarter and the implications are described in this talk:


The children of the 21st Century will have bigger challenges in bringing up their children, than the 20th Century generation. The world has changed so much since our parenting experience. While the pace of change is accelerating society's ability to keep pace with its impact is not.

Society will have problems coping with the rate of change being brought about by technological advances and innovation. The rate of change is accelerating and every indication is that the effect on mankind will be cataclysmic unless it is planned for.

The following is a Sixty Minutes feature: Are robots hurting job growth?


Here is an opinion piece on the same subject:


Kurzeweil, who is considered by some to be the world's leading artificial intelligence (AI) visionary, coined the phrase, “Singularity” to describe the moment in the future when humans and machines will supposedly converge. He sees this happening by 2029 just fifteen years away.




Pundits are conflicted about this trend as portrayed in these TED talks:


Listen to the last 60 secs, of the opposing talk below, if you don't have the time. The title is half misleading. Innovation is not dead. Whether it will contribute to growth is the issue. Innovation will make things better for some and hurt others.


Notice the difference in age between the two speakers. Both agree on the rising income gap and the impact of automation. Education will be revolutionized by technology. This is not acknowledged by the second speaker. It will become more accessible. But, will people take advantage of it. What the US faces today and in the near future, the developing world will experience, not too far in the future. Innovation will continue, however currently, there is a diminishing rate of uplifting return due to innovation. More people are being rendered jobless due to automation. The first speaker acknowledges the challenges, and has a Utopian response; the second predicts society will be unable to cope and he challenges the current generation to deliver innovation that have the same uplifting impact as the past generations did.


None of these opinions delve into the massive socioeconomic-political changes that need to take place to address this trend.
Growing income inequality is a world wide phenomenon. For instance say one person makes 5,000 a month and another makes 10,000. Both get a 5% increase which takes their wages to 5,250 and 10,500 respectively. The income gap of 5,000 becomes 5,250. The wages for an unskilled or same skilled job is not going to keep pace with jobs that require special skills. It doesn't take a new set of skills to perform existing manual jobs like "load carrying", picking fruits and vegetables, etc.  Any wage increase is not because of upgraded skills. It will be paying more for people doing the same job,  to keep pace with inflation. The solution to the rising income gap is to reduce the cost to these people by way of subsidized housing, food, healthcare and education. Just about all countries provide these subsidies in some form or the other. The outlay for these “hand outs” is going to increase and needs to be planned for.

Developing countries face the problem of lack of opportunity for their citizens while developed countries are losing jobs to automation. Both are faced with people willing to work but lack opportunities. Furthermore, every country is faced with ‘Takers’ who are unproductive people, be it due to unavailability of opportunity, inability, age, or unwillingness to work.

With increasing automation, more and more jobs will be eliminated, which will increase the supply of workers and put a downward pressure on wages. There will be more and more people who are unable, or incapable and hence shut out from the "automated economy".

The short term solution to this problem is for the "productive" people the “Makers” to support the "unproductive" people the “Takers”. This is being practiced in some form or the other by every country.

Given the current socioeconomic-political situation this solution is not sustainable. We will be faced with a decreasing number of Makers that will have to support an increasing number of Takers.

The undeniable facts are:

Automation and design for manufacturing will become localized, but it will require fewer workers. The developing world will benefit and affected by this trend.

In the US the Middle Class that comprised mainly of Joe Plumber, Jack Electricians and Bob the construction man is being decimated. Wages are either stagnant or declining.


In the Developing World the opposite holds true, the Middle Class is growing and wages are improving for skilled, semi skilled and workers. But this “dividend” may be short lived. The rate at which technology is adopted by the Developing World is increasing as well. The downside of not increasing productivity is increased costs and reduced efficiency.

Wednesday, April 05, 2017

Oh Kashmir!


Kashmir is one of India's biggest colossal disasters. Regardless of the past, and whatever maybe the reason, India's inability to manage Muslim dominated areas of Kashmir has led to dire consequences.


One of the contributing issues to this situation is the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act. AFSPA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armed_Forces_(Special_Powers)_Act


It was a break down of Law and Order that resulted in the introduction of AFSPA. It is clear that this did not resolve the matter. It seems to have made matters worse.


The purpose of the Army is to defend the country. Soldiers are trained to kill/destroy enemy forces in case of an invasion. It is not the function of the Army to get involved in Law and Order issues in “Disturbed Areas”. That is the function of the local police. On occasion, during a crisis they would be assisted by the Central Reserve Police force.

In addition to the disastrous use of force to maintain Law & Order, there are multiple components at stake here:

  • Pakistan's Jihadi attitude.
  • The call for Azadi or merging with Pakistan
  • India's stance on Kashmir
  • Article 370

Pakistan's Jihadi Attitude:


The sparks to set things afire were initiated by Pakistan. India's AFSPA response to the “disturbances” added to the flames. The situation became explosive. Besides supporting the separatists, Pakistan engages and supports terrorist activities in Kashmir and other border areas. The response to this is beyond the scope of this opinion article.

The call for Azadi or merging with Pakistan:


What is being cast as a situation that requires a “political” solution is just another word for the majority Muslim population not wanting to be governed by a country where Hindus are a majority.

The following is an article that appeared in Outlook that interviews a few teenagers. It is ironic that they hold the peace sign in the photograph.



These are rebellious kids are addicted to their cause. When a child misbehaves, the parents usually steps in to disciplining them. In these cases the parents seem to have no control and the State has to step in. It is not possible to reason with them. The answer is to arrest and warn them once, twice and on the third incarcerate them in a boot camp where they are given continued excellent education along with disciple to make them productive citizens when they are released. They could be released if they provide a signed commitment that they will not engage in anti-State activity. If they break the commitment, it is back to boot camp.

Arundhati Roy is usually off the mark and impractical in her opinions, but her reporting is very relevant on the issues she reports on.



http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/azadi/297536


While there are die hard “Azadi” zealots who are unyielding, it is not just a matter of what Kashmir wants. It is also a matter of what India expects of Kashmiris.

The following hard hitting opinion bears some truth and also indicates the depth of the problem.


http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/stone-manifesto/297544


India spends on providing protection and Services to the Separatists who are calling for Azadi. Besides being outrages it tantamounts to stupidity. Paying for the very people who are against India's position. 


http://www.oneindia.com/india/india-spent-rs-356-crore-5-years-on-protection-privileges-for-kashmir-2202969.html


http://www.firstpost.com/india/kashmir-unrest-miffed-centre-to-toughen-stand-against-separatists-cut-funds-and-security-2993574.html


Kashmiriyat, Insaniyat (humanity) or Jamhooriyat (democracy), has been turned into Cash Me In, Insanity and Jihadi Jamboree. Inviting them for talks is fine, but if they cling to their position of demanding Secession, then there ought to be no seat for them at the table.

India's Stance on Kashmir:


India's stance on Kashmir has a lot to do regards the situation in Kashmir. In the past the approach seems to have been, we can talk, we will, we won't discuss Kashmir. Oh nol We will discuss anything but Kashmir. At least that is the perception people have. It has been a wishy washy approach to an issue that Pakistan and India have never agreed upon.


Some propose Kashmir ought to be given Independence. Really? Does that mean anytime there is a majority in a jurisdiction demanding Independence, it should be considered? What about the North East, and the agitation for Khalistan? On the International stage, what about Hong Kong? They have a different currency and would prefer autonomy from China. Besides “Kashmir” consists of Kashmir Valley, Jammu and Ladakh. All of these areas have strategic importance to India by way of rivers and border control. More autonomy is an option, not just for Kashmir, but under the federal structure of India applicable to all States. Independence is off the table.


It is only recently that thanks to the Modi administration that India has forcefully declared that Kashmir is an part of India. No ifs and buts, that is it. That said, any mention to the contrary has to been responded with, “Kashmir is an integral part of India”. This is the official party line and ought to be repeated as often as necessary if the topic is broached by any state or non-state party.


Second India has clearly stated that India will not discuss Kashmir with any external party. That means Pakistan, the UN and other external wannabe interlocutors. In this matter any discussion on Kashmir is “off the table.” It is strictly an internal affair and it is India's business to resolve. Any suggestion/approach by an external party ought to be responded with, “Sorry, Kashmir is an integral part of India, India will not entertain any discussion on Kashmir with anyone.” Finally, it's about time, this has been communicated by the Modi administration.


Third, India should politely refuse any discussion on this matter in the UN forum. India's position is that the past is the past. In the present context, with the new leadership, this is not an external issue that India will participate in the UN. The UN may bring this issue and discuss it, but India will not participate and will deny any resolution contrary to India's stated position.


Finally, Pakistan has to be put in its place. It has and continues to be a hostile and aggressive neighbour, behaving like a five year old child who is adamant that Kashmir belongs to it and will never give in. It is like a child that cannot be reasoned with. It will continue to whine, complain, cry to whoever will listen. India's message to Pakistan ought to be, “go to your time out corner, when you exhibit mature behaviour and India concurs, then and only then will there be bilateral talks. Until then India should break off all diplomatic and political interaction and communications. There are good people in Pakistan and it would benefit both countries if there are cultural, sports exchanges, cross border visits and business. By all means back channel discussion can continue. But from an official standpoint India treats Pakistan as “persona non grata”.


Article 370:


This is a major political issue. 


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_370


One asymmetrical aspect is non-Kashmiris cannot buy land or own businesses in Kashmir, while Kashmiris can own land and businesses in the rest of India. Autonomy of all States should be entertained under the federal framework of India.


In Summary:

  • The focus should be in establishing Law and Order without the army.
  • Political discourse is confined to Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh being an integral part of India.
  • The house of Kashmir is in disorder and it is incumbent of Kashmiris to put it in order, with help from the Center. 
  • Deal with the attempts by the hostile neighbour. 
  • The army's role is to stop intrusion from the border and collaborate with internal security forces only on specific occasions when overt conflict occurs. 
  • Establish three States; namely – Kashmir, Jammu snd Ladakh.
  • Consider modifying Article 370 with the entire country in mind, with inputs from all the states.